Charitable Gift Annuities Are 0n The Rise
Share Button

Charitable Gift Annuities Are 0n The Rise

By Karen Hube
Tue, Dec 15, 2020 4:57amGrey Clock 3 min

Move over, charitable trusts. Make way for the charitable gift annuity.

Typically viewed as entry-level gifting methods thanks to low minimum contribution amounts, low cost, and simplicity, charitable gift annuities have had a spike in inflows from wealthy donors lately. According to a BNY Mellon Wealth Management study, in 2019, assets in gift annuities were up 21% over the prior year, and the average gift was 56% larger. Assets continued to flow into charitable trusts, but at only a slightly higher level than in 2018.

The surge in popularity in gift annuities is likely a result of people’s desire for a guaranteed lifetime annuity at a time when yields are at historic lows in the fixed-income market, and a hesitation to sock money into a charitable remainder annuity trust (CRAT). 

A CRAT is the gift annuity’s equivalent in the trust world, and typically a popular tool. But ultralow interest rates and high valuations in the stock market make for a lousy environment for CRATs, says Crystal Thompkins, national director of gift planning services at BNY Mellon Wealth Management, who expects gift annuities’ popularity to extend through this year. 

As winds shift in the economy, the markets, and regulatory environment, it’s not uncommon for the popularity of different charitable planning tools to rise and fall. Given the surge in popularity of gift annuities, it’s worth a look at how they size up these days relative to their closest charitable trust cousin. 

Charitable Gift Annuities

A charitable gift annuity is a simple contract guaranteeing that if you give a nonprofit organisation a lump sum, it will pay you a fixed, lifetime annuity based on actuarial factors—a host of market factors combined with your life expectancy. Minimum donations are around $2,000 and, unlike a trust, no attorney is required to set one up (hence no attorney fees).

Even if you live beyond your life expectancy, after your lump-sum equivalent has been paid out, you continue to receive the annuity. Depending on the contract, the annuity can continue to pay out to a surviving spouse. If you and your spouse die before your lump sum has been paid out, the charity keeps the balance in its coffers.

Payments can be deferred, which increases the amount paid out in the future annuity. A partial donation for the gift can be taken upfront. Capital gains taxes on the growth of underlying assets are spread over the annuity payments. When interest rates are low, the future capital gains’ bite out of annuity payments is lower, leaving more intact as income, Thompkins says. 

Nonprofit groups that offer charitable annuities have large infrastructures, such as museums and universities. “We’re talking those with hundreds of millions in assets that are segregated to support their annuity programs,” Thompkins says. “These are diverse pools designed to absorb potential risk. It’s like managing a pension.”

The downside is that not all nonprofits offer gift annuities, and they aren’t customised, says Pam Lucina, chief fiduciary officer at Northern Trust. 

Charitable Remainder Trusts

In contrast, trusts can pay out to a number of different charities, over a specified period of time instead of a lifetime, and can be used to transfer assets to heirs. The CRAT is the most similar to a gift annuity: It turns a lump sum into an annuity, and what’s left at the end goes to charity—at least 10% of assets transferred to the trust is required to be left as a gift. 

But the CRAT has lost its luster lately, Thompkins says. The annuity and future gift are dependent on the high probability of the underlying invested assets performing within certain parameters. With stock market valuations high, and the economy in ragged shape due to Covid-19, there’s good reason for concern that the market could enter a sustained bear market.

“In 2008 and 2009, there were trusts that were exhausted with no benefit to either the charity or the donor,” Thompkins says. “Many people are leery now.”



MOST POPULAR

What a quarter-million dollars gets you in the western capital.

Alexandre de Betak and his wife are focusing on their most personal project yet.

Related Stories
Money
The Generosity Power Move That Can Boost Your Career
By RACHEL FEINTZEIG 22/10/2024
Money
Behind Many Powerful Women on Wall Street: A Doting ‘Househusband’
By MIRIAM GOTTFRIED 22/10/2024
Money
By JACKY WONG 21/10/2024

To get ahead, learn how to be a connector

By RACHEL FEINTZEIG
Tue, Oct 22, 2024 4 min

Connectors always know just who you should talk to. They send the perfect introductory emails: warm, crisp, direct. And they make it look so effortless.

“It’s almost like music or something,” says David Dewane, a Chicago architect who loves introducing contacts from all parts of his life. “If you do it right, what you get is a little flash of possibility for both people.”

And possibility for the connector, too. Call it karma, the power of networks , or even just luck . If you become that hub for your friends and colleagues, it will come back to you, enriching your circles.

I think of people I know in my own life, the ones I speed text when I need a doctor for my kid. I feel so grateful, like they’re these life buoys that help keep me afloat. I wonder: Can the rest of us do that?

“We all develop a point at which the network that we’re in can’t satisfy our needs anymore,” says Brian Uzzi, a professor at Northwestern’s Kellogg School of Management who studies social network science.

When we become brokers, dipping in and out of various groups, we have access to all kinds of new information: little tips, fresh opportunities. Synthesizing multiple viewpoints, we’re better able to solve problems in innovative ways, Uzzi says. People love us for it.

Getting ahead

Connectors are more likely to get promoted and win bigger bonuses , Uzzi says. In one study of M.B.A. students, those who acted as brokers between cliques were twice as likely to get the best job offers upon graduating, he adds.

The key is to give before you ask.

“The idea of reciprocity is very powerful,” says Greg Pryor, a longtime human-resources executive who now researches organizational psychology topics.

Need a favor while you’re building a relationship, and you’re automatically in debt, he says. Instead, his career has been guided by a pay-it-forward mentality. He ends most calls by asking, “Is there anything I can do to help you?”

One time, a colleague asked if Pryor could get an acquaintance of hers up to speed on the topic of corporate culture and values. He spent a day with the friend-of-a-friend and connected her to others in the industry he thought could help.

The woman ended up becoming the chief human resources officer at software company Workday. When Pryor was looking for his next job, he reached out to her. A few weeks later, he was the new head of talent at Workday.

He spent a decade there, the best stretch of his career, he says.

The email formula

There’s an art to crafting the perfect email intro. Dewane, the Chicago architect who’s orchestrated thousands of introductions, is constantly scanning his mental Rolodex for pairs of contacts who can solve each other’s problems. He usually gets preapproval to reach out from both parties, then turns to his formula.

There’s two paragraphs—one for each person. He describes what they do, why he thought of them, and how they’re perfect to connect on this particular thing. He includes hyperlinks to both LinkedIn profiles. And he always puts the person who stands to gain more from the interaction last, queuing them up to initiate contact.

“I get kind of paranoid if intros just hang there,” he says.

If there’s a big difference in power between the two people, he choreographs the thread even more intricately. When connecting architecture students with professionals he knows at design studios, he’ll inform the students that he’s sending the email at 8 a.m. They are to reply by 8:04 a.m.

“I am going to open the door and then you are going to walk through it,” he says.

Oftentimes people freeze as they sit down to pen an email, scared of overpromising, says Erica Dhawan, a St. Petersburg, Fla.-based leadership consultant and author of a book about digital communication. Sliding into someone’s inbox involves risk. You’re encroaching on their time and looping yourself to two disparate contacts who may or may not hit it off.

Dhawan recommends using the phrase, “no guilt, no obligation,” when asking people if they’re open to connecting.

“I want them to feel like there’s mutual benefit,” she says, not like they’re doing her a favour.

Worst intro ever

Being on the receiving end of an introduction can also leave your stomach in knots, if it’s not done right.

“I’m in an email thread and I’m like, I don’t know why I’m here,” says Khaled Bashir, the founder of a marketing agency and AI startup in Toronto. “What am I supposed to do?”

Fellow founders will often connect him with potential clients. At least he thinks that’s what they are. The context is sometimes missing, and he’d appreciate a funny icebreaker so he can slide into the conversation without it having to be all business.

Bad intros can have happy endings, though.

Years back, Bashir was thrown into a random WhatsApp group by a client. No explanation, just him and one other guy. It turned out the other person was a fellow agency owner. The pair became fast friends. They bonded over the synergies in their work and a love of Japanese comics. Now, Bashir is selling the marketing part of his business to the friend, a move that will let him focus on growing his AI offerings.

Bon appétit

To make connections less awkward, add food. Michael Magdelinskas, who works in government affairs for a consulting firm, hosts frequent dinner parties at his Manhattan apartment. Over sous-vide pork chops and cognac ice cream, he brings together everyone from former colleagues to acquaintances visiting from overseas.

He crafts guest lists by thinking about common hobbies, hometowns and the ratio of introverts to extroverts. Recently, a group of attendees formed their own Instagram chat thread, bonding over an inside joke. They didn’t even think to include Magdelinskas.

“That’s a good thing,” he says. “That means the process is working.”