Returns might improve, but the power of chaebols—including Samsung and Hyundai—will limit gains
3 min
South Korea is taking a page from Japan to boost its stock market. There are certainly some low-hanging fruits to pick, but the country’s large family-controlled corporate empires, known as chaebols, could be an obstacle to more meaningful structural change.
The country’s stock exchange is set to unveil a stock index that will take into account factors such as profitability and shareholder returns. That is modelled after a similar move taken in 2014 by Japan, which uses its new index to essentially name and shame companies that failed to make the grade.
The new index is just a part of Korea’s “corporate value-up” program announced in February, aiming to boost the valuations of its market with shareholder-friendly policies. The government also proposed making changes to the tax code to encourage companies to pay more dividends. More broadly, South Korea hopes to copy the success of Japan’s drive to improve corporate governance and returns to investors.
Buybacks and dividends in Japan have risen, and shareholders have grown more vocal. Companies also are unloading their nonstrategic shareholdings in other companies, slimming down their balance sheets.
As a result, Japan has been one of the best-performing markets in the world in recent years. The Topix index hit a record high in July, nearly 35 years after its famous bubble burst.
On the other hand, South Korea’s stock market has long suffered from a so-called Korea discount , as it trades more cheaply than other emerging markets. Its main benchmark, Kospi Composite index, has been valued at an average 12 times forward earnings in the past decade, compared with around 15 times for Japan’s Topix and Taiwan’s Taiex each.
Japan’s index has gained 40% since the end of 2022, while Taiwan’s has surged 57%. Korea’s, by contrast, has gone up only 16% over the same period.
Similar to their counterparts in Japan, Korean companies haven’t historically been willing to return much capital to shareholders. The dividend yield on the Kospi is below 2%, which is lower than many markets. Buybacks are paltry and, more important, many Korean companies don’t cancel the shares they have bought back, instead keeping them as treasury shares, using that as a tool for major shareholders to keep control of the company.
On that front, there seems to be some progress. Treasury share cancellation, excluding Samsung Electronics , so far this year has already more than doubled the full-year level of 2023, according to Goldman Sachs . New regulations restricting how companies can use their treasury shares is probably one reason. Financial companies, in particular, have been eager to buy back and cancel their shares.
The elephant in the room, however, is the power of chaebols, which dominate Korea’s economy and stock market. Companies in the Samsung group, for example, make up more than 20% of the Kospi index. Besides the electronics brand, this includes companies in areas as disparate as financial services and shipbuilding. The interests of the families who control these vast corporate empires don’t usually align with those of the minority shareholders.
Instead, they have long used convoluted corporate structures, including extensive cross-shareholdings, to maintain their grip on the conglomerates. Given the chaebols’ strong economic and political influence in the country, they won’t be so easily pressured as Japanese companies have been to unwind these arrangements.
High inheritance taxes are another reason the families might not necessarily want high share prices for their companies. The government has proposed reducing the tax, but it might not be enough.
Korea’ stock market, which houses some of the world’s best-known brands, including Samsung and Hyundai Motor , has long been a laggard. The government’s new push might yield some successes, but its biggest companies could remain the toughest nuts to crack.
Copyright 2020, Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide. LEARN MORE
A resurgence in high-end travel to Egypt is being driven by museum openings, private river journeys and renewed long-term investment along the Nile.
In the lead-up to the country’s biggest dog show, a third-generation handler prepares a gaggle of premier canines vying for the top prize.
Parts for iPhones to cost more owing to surging demand from AI companies.
4 min
Apple has dominated the electronics supply chain for years. No more.
Artificial-intelligence companies are writing huge checks for chips, memory, specialised glass fibre and more, and they have begun to out-duel Apple in the race to secure components.
Suppliers accustomed to catering to Apple’s every whim are gaining the leverage to demand that the iPhone maker pay more.
Apple’s normally generous profit margins will face pressure this year, analysts say, and consumers could eventually feel the hit.
Chief Executive Tim Cook mentioned the problem in a Thursday earnings call, saying Apple was seeing constraints in its chip supplies and that memory prices were increasing significantly.
Those comments appeared to weigh on Apple shares, which traded flat despite blowout iPhone sales and record company profit.
“Apple is getting squeezed for sure,” said Sravan Kundojjala, who analyses the industry for research firm SemiAnalysis.
AI chip leader Nvidia recently became the largest customer of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing , or TSMC, Nvidia Chief Executive Jensen Huang said on a podcast.
Apple had been TSMC’s biggest customer by a wide margin for years. TSMC is the world’s leading manufacturer of advanced chips for AI servers, smartphones and other computing devices.
Spokesmen for Apple and TSMC declined to comment.
The big computers that handle AI tasks don’t look like the smartphones consumers own, but many companies supply components for both. In particular, memory chips are in short supply as companies such as OpenAI, Alphabet’s Google, Meta , Microsoft and others collectively spend hundreds of billions of dollars to build AI computing capacity.
“The rate of increase in the price of memory is unprecedented,” said Mike Howard , an analyst for research firm TechInsights.
That applies both to the flash memory chips that store photos and videos, called NAND, as well as the memory used to run apps quickly, called DRAM.
By the end of this year, the price of DRAM will quadruple from 2023 levels, and NAND will more than triple, estimates TechInsights.
Howard estimates that Apple could pay $57 more for the two types of memory that go into the base-model iPhone 18 due this fall compared with the base model iPhone 17 currently on sale. For a device that retails for $799, that would be a big hit to profit margins.
Apple’s purchasing power and expertise in designing advanced electronics long made it an unrivaled Goliath among the Asian companies that make most of the iPhone’s parts and assemble the device.
Apple spends billions of dollars a year on NAND, for instance, according to people familiar with the figures, likely making it the single biggest buyer globally. Suppliers flocked to win Apple’s business, hoping to leverage its know-how and prestige to attract other customers.
These days, however, “the companies now pushing the boundaries of human‑scale engineering are the ones like Nvidia,” said Ming-chi Kuo, an analyst with TF International Securities.
Demand for AI hardware is poised to keep growing rapidly. Apple’s spending growth is modest in comparison with what is being spent to fill up AI data centers, even though it is breaking records with huge sales of the iPhone 17.
Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix are raising the price of a type of DRAM chip for Apple, according to people familiar with Apple’s supply chain.
Big AI companies pay generously and are willing to lock in supply and make upfront payments, giving the South Korean chip makers leverage against the iPhone maker.
Apple signs long-term contracts for memory, but it has used its heft to squeeze suppliers.
Its contracts have empowered it to negotiate prices as often as weekly, and to even refuse to buy any memory from a supplier if Apple didn’t view the price as favorable, according to people familiar with its memory purchases.
To boost leverage with suppliers, Apple even began stocking more inventory of memory. That was atypical for Cook, who normally cuts inventory to the bone to maximize Apple’s cash flow.
Apple is fighting not only for current deliveries but also for the attention of engineers at suppliers.
Glass scientists who worked on developing the smoothest and lightest smartphone displays are now also spending time on specialised glass for packaging advanced AI processing chips, according to industry executives.
Makers of sensors and other gizmos inside the iPhone are winning new business from AI companies such as OpenAI that are developing their own hardware.
Still, suppliers said they were far from giving up on business with Apple. Working with Apple is a form of education, they said, because it remains one of the most demanding and disciplined customers in the industry.
TSMC, the Taiwanese chip manufacturer, has built successive generations of its most advanced chips with Apple as its lead customer, relying on the big predictable demand for iPhones.
Now that TSMC is doing more business with Nvidia and other AI companies, people with knowledge of the chip supply chain said Apple was exploring whether some lower-end processors could be made by someone other than TSMC.
One of Apple’s biggest profit-spinners is selling extra memory for far more than the memory chips cost the company.
Last fall Apple discontinued the iPhone Pro model with 128 gigabytes of storage.
Customers who want that model must now start at 256 gigabytes and pay $100 more—the type of move that could be repeated this year to help Apple offset higher costs, wrote Craig Moffett, an analyst at Moffett Nathanson, in an investor note.
However, Apple isn’t expected to raise the price of its next iPhone models over similarly equipped iPhone 17s, said Kuo, the analyst.
News Corp, owner of The Wall Street Journal, has a commercial agreement to supply news through Apple services.
