The designer furniture retailer opens its first ‘bricks and mortar’ store in the busy Chinatown district today
2 minLovers of interior design now have a new destination with Australian designer furniture retailer Cult opening its first store in Singapore today.
The store at 48 Club Street, Singapore represents Cult’s first foray into a ‘bricks and mortar’ retail environment in Asia, following on from six years of B2B activity in Asia.
Founded in Sydney by Richard Munao in 1997 as Corporate Culture, the Singapore Cult store located in the heart of the busy Chinatown district will stock familiar Australian brands such as Nau, Tait and Coco Flip, as well as Danish design houses including HAY, Gubi, Vipp and &Tradition.
Cult has been active in Singapore since 2017, with the team completing projects across Asia in China, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea and Thailand, among others.
Much like the evolution from a trade-only business in Australia to a popular retail environment with stores in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth and Adelaide, Mr Munao said the opening of the store in Chinatown is in response to repeated demand from clients to be able to experience and access the products for themselves.
“Our first six years in Singapore were dedicated to relationship building with key clients and increasing the Cult brand awareness within the regional design community,” he said.
“During the pandemic the rising demand for well-designed furniture for the home also led to a sharp increase in retail enquiries, sales and repeated requests from retail clients for us to have a physical store to visit.”
Business development manager for Cult Singapore, Ravi Shankar, said now was the right time to launch the business to the wider public with an eye for design.
“Affluent Singaporeans are willing to spend more to furnish their homes and businesses now than 10 years ago, when only the wealthiest individuals and corporations would consider ‘designer’ furniture,” he said. “Singapore also remains a gateway to South East Asia, with some of the best design work for the region being undertaken by firms in Singapore.
“This is likely to continue with the steady influx of talent and organisations from areas such as Hong Kong and Shanghai.”
The Australian leather house has opened an immersive four-day pop-up in Manhattan, unveiling its Bloom Collection and redefining what a product launch can look like.
Following the successful launch of its Palais Collection, MAISON de SABRÉ has unveiled a new modular handbag system offering more than 720 styling combinations.
Meta is betting on a human-first AI future, but growing legal battles and declining public trust are putting Mark Zuckerberg’s vision to the test.
3 min
“Call us optimists. Call us dreamers. Call us whatever the hell you want, but we’re betting on people, and we like those odds. The future is for everyone.”
That ad copy is from the voice-over of a July Meta Platforms META -3.38%.
spot that’s been part of a public-relations blitz to position Meta as the humanist AI company. The message was undercut by the ad’s inclusion of David Bowie’s “Five Years,” a brooding 1972 song about an impending apocalypse. But this week CEO Mark Zuckerberg left no ambiguity, publishing a 6,500-word manifesto—about 10 times the length of this newsletter—with a title that echoed the ad: “The Future is for Everyone.”
That seems to be Meta’s new tagline. In light of sinking public opinion and the company’s thousands of lawsuits from states, school districts, parents, and users, Meta’s public relations have been defensive. This push represents a return to offense, with a chance to distinguish Meta’s approach to AI from other labs like OpenAI, Anthropic, or SpaceX SPCX +9.65%.
“It is surprising that the discourse from many developing AI is so filled with doom,” Zuckerberg wrote. “I do not understand why anyone who believes that AI will eliminate most jobs and much of humanity’s relevance would rush to build that future.”
Zuckerberg frames what sort of future we build with AI as the central issue of our time. “We believe that delivering superintelligence to everyone is the way to answer this question,” he says. “This has the potential to begin a new era of personal empowerment where individuals can use this powerful new capability to reach their full potential, pursue their interests, and improve their lives and the world more than ever before.”
The flood of words belies the situation on the ground in mid-2026. Americans, at least, have a love-hate affair with social media. A November Pew Research Center poll reported that 71% of U.S. adults used Facebook, and 51% used Instagram. Worldwide, 3.6 billion people use at least one Meta app every day.
But in a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted in July and August, 61% of respondents said they wanted more government oversight of social media, and two-thirds supported laws to keep children under 16 years old off the platforms. When it comes to Meta in particular, in the 2026 Axios Harris 100, an annual poll about corporate reputation, Meta placed 96th out of 100. It’s only above two other social media companies, Chinese ultracheap retailer Temu, and Spirit Airlines, a defunct air carrier. Regarding ethics, Meta came in last, and it was only ahead of TikTok in trust.
The steady drip of headlines in the teen social media trials isn’t helping. Last week, Meta lost a judgment in New Mexico state court that raised their liability in that relatively small jurisdiction to nearly $1 billion dollars. On Wednesday, jury selection began for a federal case with four states suing Meta over addictive product design, and false marketing that said its platforms were safe for teenagers. In July, Meta claimed that the states are asking for a total of $1.4 trillion in damages, in addition to design changes in the apps. This is part of a multidistrict litigation, where thousands of federal trials with social media defendants are coordinated in Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers’ district courthouse in Oakland, Calif.
There is a separate such group of thousands of cases in California state court, mostly with individual plaintiffs. The steady drip of bad headlines from the courts will continue unless Meta decides to settle en masse.
Meanwhile, in the second quarter, Meta booked “$2.40 billion of charges related to legal proceedings,” according to its quarterly filing. That may be just the beginning.
Zuckerberg spent 6,500 words getting his utopian message out, but I can sum it up in two: Trust us. The evidence is that Meta has a long way to go to win back that trust.
