What Readers Want to See in the Workplaces of the Future
Ideas for improving office life, courtesy of those who have to work in them.
Ideas for improving office life, courtesy of those who have to work in them.
From mazes of cubicles to plentiful lush balconies , office designers keep re-envisioning spaces to support our professional lives. Not all of their ideas have been…work-friendly, shall we say.
We thought it would be productive to ask the workers themselves—in this case Wall Street Journal readers—for a little brainstorming to see what their employers could be doing better.
We asked, What office-design change would you most like to see?
Their responses covered a lot of ground, from workplace conventions to technology to the environment itself.
Similar to a lunch break, I wish we could have a phone break each day. Staff members would place their phones in a box that would then be removed and face-to-face conversation would be encouraged instead.
This is an important cognitive disconnect. People are responding more slowly to face-to-face conversations as their minds alternate between concentrating on their device and in-real-life interactions.
This no-device speakeasy would be less structured around work and more like a hangout: Someone just kicks off a conversation and folks follow on.
• Desmond Latham, Pearly Beach, Western Cape, South Africa
One way companies could make the return to office smoother would be to have assigned offices and desks.
Having a consistent space provides employees with stability and a sense of belonging, rather than navigating the uncertainty of finding a spot each day.
• Gabriela Valdez, Prosper, Texas
I would like to see office buildings that blend seamlessly into residential neighbourhoods. I
nstead of towering corporate headquarters in city centers, companies would operate from house-like suites scattered across communities.
Employees could walk to work, bring their children or pets along, and enjoy flexible hours without the grind of daily commuting.
Walls would be lined with immersive video screens, allowing teams across the country to collaborate as if they were in the same room.
This model could save trillions in transportation costs, road construction and pollution while offering workers a healthier and more affordable lifestyle.
By eliminating the need for massive skyscrapers, corporations would redirect capital into smaller, interconnected hubs that foster community integration.
The environmental benefits are equally striking: fewer cars on the road, reduced emissions, and less strain on public infrastructure.
• Michael Lowery, Colorado Springs, Colo.
I’d like to see a focus on the actual employees.
Why aren’t employers asking them what spaces they need to do the most productive work?
What environments are most conducive to enjoying the work they do? Private offices aren’t the answer for everyone but most workers need more than a traditional cubicle.
Same with artwork and furnishings. One size or style isn’t appealing to everyone.
• Nancy Sanders, Phoenix
I want an actual functioning cone of silence at work. This would be used so workers that are on conference calls for many hours every day don’t disturb their co-workers with all of their talking.
At many firms, offices with hard walls and doors are only assigned to managers with a minimum number of direct reports.
I think they should be assigned instead based on how many hours a day the person is on conference calls.
And that’s not for the benefit of the projects they manage but for everyone else who otherwise has to listen to one side of a conversation for four to six hours a day.
I know many companies are enthusiastic about open-office plans, but I don’t know any engineers who like them, so many have no choice but to wear headphones and play music to drown out the distractions, which leads to isolation even in a well-populated office.
• Paul Egan, Milwaukee
I’m gobsmacked that there is no mention of bathrooms in these stories about future office design. If you want to get employees back to an office, offer more privacy there.
• Lisa Hale, Los Angeles
Standing desks are passé if not accompanied by an under desk treadmill.
• Taylor Archibald, Provo, Utah
I’d like to see a return to cubicles or small alcove-style workspaces and a step away from the fully open-office concept.
Open layouts were meant to spark collaboration, but in practice they often create constant noise, distractions and a sense of being “on display.”
Most knowledge work requires periods of sustained focus, and people do their best thinking when they have a bit of privacy and control over their environment.
Cubicles and alcoves don’t eliminate teamwork, but simply give employees a dedicated space to concentrate, recharge and hold quiet conversations without disrupting others.
When combined with designated collaboration zones, these semiprivate spaces create a healthy balance between focus and teamwork.
In a hybrid-work world, the office should be a place that enhances productivity and restoring a sense of personal space would help achieve that.
• James Wright, Grand Rapids, Mich.
I’d love to see the addition of some colour. Any colour at all besides gray and beige. I’ve worked in offices for most of my life, and the “grayge” neutrals are suffocating.
I would also like to have more powered standing desks in the office. The hand-operated ones are too complicated or too fragile to allow for regular lifting and lowering. Every one I’ve had has broken.
• Tony Holmes, Prince William County, Va.
I wish we had more flex space.
That would be where office designers create a variety of workspaces: standing desks, treadmill desks, quiet rooms, lounge areas, etc., so the team can move through different ergonomic worksites throughout the day and keep their bodies and minds flexible and active.
• Sam McNulty, Cleveland
I believe that companies should focus on how to make the workplace more comfortable, even homey.
We spend more of our time at the office than we do awake at home. The office therefore should be a place that one looks forward to going to.
This could be achieved with upholstery that shows the company cares that you’re there.
Comfortable chairs and desks, up-to-date technology, a subsidized kitchen and a dining room that invites collaboration and connection between co-workers.
• Andre Mora, Miami
We need nap areas, like pods or mini-bedrooms as well as gym and shower areas.
• Sara Jones, Hillsborough, N.C.
Get the private offices with doors away from the perimeter windows! Move those offices to the interior of the floor plates so more light can flood the workspace and everyone can look out the windows!
Our office was reworked this way and our copy/print/supply area ended up along a perimeter window.
Everyone looks outside while they wait for the print jobs to finish.
We also used low-rise desks so it’s possible to look out the perimeter windows from the private offices.
Our private offices are glass-doored and glass-walled, so there’s a lot of visibility throughout our offices.
• Andrew Skotdal, Everett, Wash.
I’m hoping for a coffee-delivery drone robot that lets me stay on a two-hour call without a BRB (Be Right Back) coffee break.
• John Dabbar, Oyster Bay, N.Y.
The Australian leather house has opened an immersive four-day pop-up in Manhattan, unveiling its Bloom Collection and redefining what a product launch can look like.
Following the successful launch of its Palais Collection, MAISON de SABRÉ has unveiled a new modular handbag system offering more than 720 styling combinations.
Meta is betting on a human-first AI future, but growing legal battles and declining public trust are putting Mark Zuckerberg’s vision to the test.
“Call us optimists. Call us dreamers. Call us whatever the hell you want, but we’re betting on people, and we like those odds. The future is for everyone.”
That ad copy is from the voice-over of a July Meta Platforms META -3.38%.
spot that’s been part of a public-relations blitz to position Meta as the humanist AI company. The message was undercut by the ad’s inclusion of David Bowie’s “Five Years,” a brooding 1972 song about an impending apocalypse. But this week CEO Mark Zuckerberg left no ambiguity, publishing a 6,500-word manifesto—about 10 times the length of this newsletter—with a title that echoed the ad: “The Future is for Everyone.”
That seems to be Meta’s new tagline. In light of sinking public opinion and the company’s thousands of lawsuits from states, school districts, parents, and users, Meta’s public relations have been defensive. This push represents a return to offense, with a chance to distinguish Meta’s approach to AI from other labs like OpenAI, Anthropic, or SpaceX SPCX +9.65%.
“It is surprising that the discourse from many developing AI is so filled with doom,” Zuckerberg wrote. “I do not understand why anyone who believes that AI will eliminate most jobs and much of humanity’s relevance would rush to build that future.”
Zuckerberg frames what sort of future we build with AI as the central issue of our time. “We believe that delivering superintelligence to everyone is the way to answer this question,” he says. “This has the potential to begin a new era of personal empowerment where individuals can use this powerful new capability to reach their full potential, pursue their interests, and improve their lives and the world more than ever before.”
The flood of words belies the situation on the ground in mid-2026. Americans, at least, have a love-hate affair with social media. A November Pew Research Center poll reported that 71% of U.S. adults used Facebook, and 51% used Instagram. Worldwide, 3.6 billion people use at least one Meta app every day.
But in a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted in July and August, 61% of respondents said they wanted more government oversight of social media, and two-thirds supported laws to keep children under 16 years old off the platforms. When it comes to Meta in particular, in the 2026 Axios Harris 100, an annual poll about corporate reputation, Meta placed 96th out of 100. It’s only above two other social media companies, Chinese ultracheap retailer Temu, and Spirit Airlines, a defunct air carrier. Regarding ethics, Meta came in last, and it was only ahead of TikTok in trust.
The steady drip of headlines in the teen social media trials isn’t helping. Last week, Meta lost a judgment in New Mexico state court that raised their liability in that relatively small jurisdiction to nearly $1 billion dollars. On Wednesday, jury selection began for a federal case with four states suing Meta over addictive product design, and false marketing that said its platforms were safe for teenagers. In July, Meta claimed that the states are asking for a total of $1.4 trillion in damages, in addition to design changes in the apps. This is part of a multidistrict litigation, where thousands of federal trials with social media defendants are coordinated in Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers’ district courthouse in Oakland, Calif.
There is a separate such group of thousands of cases in California state court, mostly with individual plaintiffs. The steady drip of bad headlines from the courts will continue unless Meta decides to settle en masse.
Meanwhile, in the second quarter, Meta booked “$2.40 billion of charges related to legal proceedings,” according to its quarterly filing. That may be just the beginning.
Zuckerberg spent 6,500 words getting his utopian message out, but I can sum it up in two: Trust us. The evidence is that Meta has a long way to go to win back that trust.