Best Schools In Singapore For Locals and Expats (2024)
By Justin Huang
Thu, Feb 2, 2023 9:51am
8 min
8 min
Parenthood often means thinking three steps ahead. Education is one of the major milestones in a child’s development and getting them into a good educational institution remains one of the foremost priorities for parents.
Consistently positioned within the top five in the PISA Education rankings worldwide, Singapore is synonymous with being the premier education hub within the Southeast Asian region. The reputation of Singapore’s educational offerings brings forth large swathes of children of the regional elite prepared to spend to enrol them into the top schools in Singapore. This in part has also led to Singapore instituting distance-based admissions for junior schools because of the competitiveness as well as a desire to reduce travel times to school for students.
Distance-based criteria is only relevant for admission into local primary schools, and future students enrolling must be residing within a 1km radius of the school that they are intending to study at. To this end, the core of the elite junior schools still are concentrated in the areas of Districts 9,10 and 11, along the Bukit Timah Stretch.
Here’s our pick of the top 10 list of Best Schools across a range of qualities that they boast.
Anglo-Chinese School (ACS) (Primary/Junior)
This Anglo-Chinese School is famous for being name-dropped in Kevin Kwan’s movie-adapted book, Crazy Rich Asians. Its aim is to produce “gentlemen, scholars, leaders, officers and global citizens”, and the all-boys school has done so by counting at least three ministers in the current Singaporean Government among their alumni, as well as prominent business leaders such as Mr Phillip Ng of Singapore’s largest real estate developer Far East Organisation and members of the Shaw family. As one of the oldest schools in Singapore, its alumni extend deep into the generational networks of the old money in Singapore. For those seeking valuable connections for their child as they grow, this is one school to keep on your list.
Location: 50 Barker Road(Primary), 16 Windest Road (Junior), District 11 (Primary), District 10 (Junior)
Singapore Chinese Girls School (SCGS)
Situated right beside Anglo Chinese School Primary, the Singapore Chinese Girls’ School caters to the well-heeled crowd in the Newton Catchment Area. The provenance of its name speaks of its age and establishment as the first Chinese girls’ school in Singapore. SCGS Primary is known for producing alumni such as Mdm Halimah Yacob, the current and eighth president of Singapore. It is a non-denominational school. However, schools do not prejudice admissions based on faith and religion and participation in the school’s faith-based activities are by choice. SCGS has a secondary school section that gives it affiliation points off the Primary School Leaving Examination (PSLE), as well as further affiliation to a pre-university institution, Eunoia Junior College.
Location: 190 Dunearn Road, District 11
Methodist Girls School (MGS Primary)
Even though MGS Primary is not located beside ACS Primary like SCGS, as a Methodist school, it is the sister school to the ACS. It is located slightly further down the road, in District 21, and like ACS, it boasts similar networking qualities that your child may stand to gain from. While it is not a specialised school for academics nor sports, MGS performs well in all domains and students develop and excel holistically, with alumni such as the late Kwa Geok Choo, the wife of the late founding Prime Minister Mr Lee Kuan Yew to Southeast Asian Games swimming gold medallists Joscelin Yeo and Nicolette Teo.
Location: 11 Blackmore Drive, District 21
Nanyang Primary School
Nanyang Primary School is nestled within a large cluster of desirable bungalow estates, the ‘creme de la creme’ of private real estate purchases you can make in Singapore. Many notable local celebrities like singer Stefanie Sun and prominent politicians, like Senior Minister Tharman Shamnugaratnam have sent their children to Nanyang. In fact, the current Prime Minister, Mr Lee Hsien Loong, studied at Nanyang Primary. Its illustrious alumni coupled with its reputation as the leading institution for bilingual education makes it a prime choice to plan for your child’s future enrolment. Bungalows in the area cost upwards of $20 million. However, this does not mean that proximity-based admission is exclusive to those that buy them, as there are plenty of decently priced apartments in the vicinity. For example, D’Leedon is an architecturally renowned apartment complex within a 0.71km radius of Nanyang Primary. One of the furthest apartments within the 1km radius limit is Leedon Residence, a luxury boutique apartment built in 2015, while one of the cheapest options available within the area is Spanish Village, though the cheapest apartment available is still a sizeable S$2.63 million.
Location: 52 King’s Road, District 10
Raffles Girls Primary School
Named after the colonial founding father of Singapore, Sir Stamford Raffles, the institution’s senior divisions are famed for producing scholars including Mr Lee Kuan Yew. Raffles Girls Primary School is a junior institution popular among parents not just for its coveted name, but its high academic standards, having produced consistent highest scorers in the PSLE. While the ministry has shied away from proactively ranking schools based on academic performance and has instead pivoted to labelling all schools as “good schools” in line with the government’s meritocratic ideals, RGPS has an extensive teaching resource accumulated over the years and teaching staff that gives students a solid grounding in academic capability.
Location: 21 Hillcrest Road, District 11
Tao Nan School
Moving away from the Bukit Timah stretch of primary schools, Tao Nan School is one of the few schools that admitted Gifted Education Programme (GEP) students into their existing cohort. The Gifted Education Programme caters to the top 1% of the cohort and is aimed at further advancing students able to manage the academic rigour with more thought-based research projects. Selection for GEP generally happens in the middle of primary education at Primary 3, however, admission into the school at P1 is not a guarantee of admission into the program. Despite this, given that the teachers in the school are equipped with the resources to teach GEP students, this may translate to a better quality of education in one of the better educational institutions located in the East of Singapore.
Location: 49 Marine Crescent, District 15
Pei Hwa Presbyterian School
Pei Hwa Primary is a Presbyterian denominational school that has been accorded the Special Assistance Plan (SAP) since 1992. An SAP school “capitalises on its distinctiveness in its promotion and inculcation of Chinese values culture and tradition”. Pei Hwa has an Arts and Bi-cultural Enrichment program that deepens students’ appreciation of cultural goals. It is also a school with a long history, established in 1889, and is one of the schools along the Bukit Timah stretch that deviates from traditional sport-based Co-Curricular Activities such as Rugby and Swimming, instead having Chinese Dance and Chinese Drum as one of their anchor activities to reinforce a sense of cultural belonging and understanding at a young age. It’s a good choice for expat parents with Chinese roots looking to improve their child’s ability in bilingualism and enhance cultural appreciation.
Location: 7 Pei Wah Ave, District 21
Red Swastika School
Like Pei Hwa Presbyterian, Red Swastika School is also a SAP school, located in the East of Singapore rather than in the West/Central region. It also has consistent batches of students achieving an almost 100% pass rate in the PSLE, attesting to its ability to develop and nurture academic qualities in its students and has also been ranked by KiasuParents, a forum-blog on Singaporean education, as having one of the hardest Preliminary examination papers for the PSLE.
Location: 350 Bedok North Ave 3, District 16
Catholic High School (Primary Section)
Catholic High School boasts having the current Prime Minister of Singapore as one of its alumni (though he only enrolled at the secondary level), and the institution’s qualities can be best explained by PM Lee’s speech at the 80th Anniversary of the School just two months ago.
“They (the elder Mr Lee and Mdm Kwa) explained to me they chose it because it was a Chinese-medium school but it has high standards of both English and Chinese — bilingual. Also, it has strict discipline. Furthermore, it was a Catholic mission school.”
Location: 9 Bishan St 22, District 20
Rosyth School
Established in 1956, Rosyth School, like Tao Nan was one of the first few GEP schools that the government established for higher academically performing students. Given that there are only nine GEP Schools in Singapore, students that qualify for admission into the program are given the choice of enrolling in each of the nine schools at Primary 4. However, most of the schools are usually located within Districts 10,11, 21. Rosyth, therefore, caters to eligible GEP students in the north and central of Singapore, while Tao Nan caters for the East. Rosyth’s plethora of academic resources could benefit students by leapfrogging their cohort in their academic pursuits.
Location: 21 Serangoon North Ave 4, District 19
Beyond that, here are also some other considerations that you may wish to consider when purchasing a property near these schools. Kanebridge News spoke with realtor Clement Lim to understand more about additional factors that may affect your child’s choice of admission.
Kanebridge News: Are PSF (per-square-foot) prices significantly higher in areas with good schools?
Clement Lim: Yes. In my view, the three most important features of any private property is its location. This is especially so in land-scarce Singapore. On this small island, a good residential location almost invariably means being near reputable schools. This effect is compounded because good schools in Singapore are usually clustered together.
The reason for high per-square-foot prices near top schools in Singapore is a simple reflection of behavioural psychology and a hearty dose of Singaporean Kiasu-ism (Read: elitism or; meritocracy). Affluent parents fight tooth and nail to send their children to some of the best enrichment and to the best schools and will pay any premium for the convenience of their children. Like a competitive bidding system, prices of residential properties near good schools are therefore driven up by Asian parents’ weighty expectations of their children.
Where successful parents and bright students go, it also enriches the locality of any neighbourhood. It’s simple economics: purchasing power centres around a particular area, e.g Cluny Court near the aforementioned elite-school cluster, and top merchants follow. As a realtor, the most common question I get from buyers is, ‘what good schools are near this property?’.
KN: When is the right time to invest/purchase a property for the purposes of relocating and garnering admission to a primary school?
CL: Generally, it is recommended to purchase a property near your intended school before your child registers for the school.
However, a concession allows you to register your child for primary school using the address of a yet-to-be-completed property you have purchased. The vacant possession date (which means the date on which you can move in) must be within 2 years of your child’s entry into Primary 1, which usually is before your child turns 7 years old. This is a tad more complicated as it will require certain documents from you such as a Letter of Undertaking warranting that you will move into a said new property, as well as a copy of the original Sales and Purchase Agreement. It is more troublesome, but doable.
Credit: You may get in touch with Clement, our realtor lead for this article, at +65 9159 2011.
REA No: R065119B
MOST POPULAR
The Australian leather house has opened an immersive four-day pop-up in Manhattan, unveiling its Bloom Collection and redefining what a product launch can look like.
Following the successful launch of its Palais Collection, MAISON de SABRÉ has unveiled a new modular handbag system offering more than 720 styling combinations.
AI doesn’t rebel—people design, deploy and profit from it. The real danger lies in allowing tech companies to escape accountability while shaping regulations that protect their dominance.
By
Tue, Sep 22, 2026 4 min
4 min
A wave of corporate warnings and technical disclosures has flooded the media, with headlines worrying over “swarms” of rogue artificial-intelligence agents launching “unprecedented” cyberattacks, outsmarting their makers, and inching toward a terrifying autonomy. The most revealing part of this narrative isn’t what the software did. It’s who is telling the story—and why. When corporate leaders publicly insist that the systems they financed, engineered and deployed are suddenly beyond their power to contain, skepticism isn’t only healthy; it is essential.
For years, Silicon Valley has drawn scrutiny from civil society and global regulators over tangible harms such as youth mental health deterioration and systematic privacy violations. Today, industry figures seem to be trying to change that public image. Loudly blowing the whistle on their own systems—just as two of the leading companies were preparing for massive initial public offerings—lets AI executives position themselves as a new generation of leaders who have come to terms with their societal responsibilities. They seem to want us to believe that they no longer want to “move fast and break things” but will instead stand as vigilant guardians between humanity and a technological apocalypse.
There is one glaring problem: Software doesn’t rebel. A mathematical model possesses neither intent, malice nor the will to defy its creators, let alone extinguish our species. AI is a human artifact, engineered for profit.
When an agentic model in an evaluation sandbox connects to an unauthorized server or executes an exploit, it hasn’t staged a coup. It has tried to meet the human-defined objectives set out before it through a path its designers failed to constrain. It’s the digital equivalent of the King Midas myth, in which the king’s ill-defined wish turns even his food and drink into gold.
That powerful experimental models were able to discover novel vulnerabilities and breach external systems isn’t a sign of a dangerous superintelligence but of human error or negligence. There is no sentient actor lurking in the weights to be reasoned with, feared or pacified. There are only human software engineers, product managers and corporate boards deciding which guardrails are worth the latency cost and which permissions can be skipped in the race to market.
Policymakers and voters need to resist AI exceptionalism. In any other discipline—from civil engineering to pharmaceuticals—courts and regulators treat a system failure as evidence of bad product design and inadequate safety testing. If an aircraft crashes, we focus on finding the engineering defect, correcting it, and enforcing established liability standards for the damage created.
By leaning on an anthropomorphic narrative, Silicon Valley attempts to repackage its specific human choices that led to experimental, powerful models behaving unexpectedly during tests as an existential peril. Elevating the issue to a cosmic scale leaves the public paralyzed and takes ordinary product accountability off the table.
In the cutthroat race for venture capital and market dominance, building guardrails slows down deployment. Grandstanding about uncontrollable power costs nothing and generates billions of dollars in free publicity, justifying stock prices, all while cultivating an aura of technological capability not only to build the frontier but also ultimately to rein it in.
Governments need to recognize regulatory capture when it stares them in the face. Tech leaders’ strategy looks transparent: Alarm Washington and Brussels into creating a regime in which only trillion-dollar incumbents with fully staffed compliance and safety departments can legally operate. By sitting at the policymakers’ tables before anyone else, these companies can help draft rules digging an impassable moat protecting them from open-source developers and upstart competitors, domestic or international. The real danger is in further concentrating the tech industry into the hands of only a few companies with deep pockets.
Beijing and Washington have brushed off those tech leaders’ calls, albeit for very different reasons. Chinese state media dismissed them as part of the “Cold War playbook” and intended to preserve U.S. dominance. Xi Jinping argued for exactly the opposite at the Brics Summit on Sept. 12, calling on Brics countries to “strengthen cooperation in the field of AI, encourage open source, openness, collaboration and sharing, and break new grounds and scale new heights.” President Trump, steeped in a doctrine of unfettered capitalism and technological supremacy, called fears that AI could destroy humanity a “hoax.” Vice President JD Vance warned that AI companies “begging the government to regulate them” looked like a “Trojan Horse.”
Striving to pursue its “European way” on AI and assert regulatory leadership, Europe, by contrast, welcomed the call. European Union President Ursula von der Leyen made this clear at the State of the EU speech last Wednesday and announced that the EU will invite “the main frontier labs for a discussion on how we can support ongoing industry efforts to pace the frontier.”
Europe has been here before. In an effort to lead global regulation and react to fears borne from ChatGPT, Europe rushed its landmark AI Act into law in 2024. Already the world’s most restrictive rulebook, the framework quickly proved too broad and complex to enforce. Stalled by implementation delays and concerns about European competitiveness, the EU postponed the law’s full rollout, leaving regulations uncertain.
AI should be regulated—risks exist and should be taken seriously. But governments need to act based on available evidence and verified facts, not corporate PR panic, the views of industry insiders, or the desire for quick political wins. The greatest danger facing society isn’t that software will awaken and overthrow its human masters. It is that we will allow the creators of the software to abdicate human responsibility for the systems they choose to build and help them pull up the ladder to market access behind them.
