When It Comes to Private Jet Perks, the Sky’s the Limit

With competition among private aviation firms as fierce as ever, the perks available to new and existing customers keep getting bigger. Gone are the days when complimentary transfers and customized in-flight amenities moved the needle. The industry’s top providers have entered into a virtual arms race, trying to out-do one another with one splashy offering after the next.

“The partnerships with celebrity chefs, VIP access to famous vineyards and sporting events, being invited to play in golf pro-ams … these comped memberships and perks valued at tens of thousands of dollars are part of a tried and tested marketing strategy among private jet companies,” says Doug Gollan, president and editor of Private Jet Card Comparisons, a buyer’s guide that tracks pricing, rules, and policies for more than 80 jet card, membership, and fractional providers.

Jet cards are a way to charter a private flight by pre-paying into a company’s program; a membership requires customers to pay an annual fee to unlock private aviation services; and fractional ownership allows individuals or businesses to share the cost and use of a private jet.

Key players such as NetJets, Flexjet, VistaJet, Wheels Up, and OneFlight have hospitality areas at in-demand events such as Formula 1, the Masters, and the Super Bowl, “places customers want to go, and where you want to make sure you are getting the VIP treatment because the crowds are overwhelming,” Gollan says.

Among the newest curated experiences and events for VistaJet members include a luxury cacao travel experience in Ecuador.
Courtesy of VistaJet

Though the perks don’t motivate users to pick a company, they play an important role for the jet companies, Gollan says.

“The perks don’t drive savvy [ultra-high-net-worth] consumers to choose one company over the other. However, they generate awareness of the companies via media coverage; they spark interest via partnering with luxury partner companies—fashion houses, private vacation clubs, luxury hotels, and automakers—and they allow the partners to market to each other’s clients,” he says. “They also allow executives to mix with their customers.”

This is important because there is a high cost of acquisition when it comes to finding potential clients who can afford private aviation. According to Gollum’s latest subscriber survey, around 40% said they were considering switching providers.

“That’s in line with previous years,” he says. “The perks and the personal interaction can be important in getting renewals.”

Earlier this year, flyExclusive announced that eligible customers will be granted one 12-month complimentary membership to Inspirato, which allows participants to book luxury travel experiences—including five-star vacation homes from Breckenridge, Colo., to Bordeaux, France—without paying a membership fee.

“We do see a wide variety of short-term perks offered in today’s market to win business,” says Brad Blettner, flyExclusive’s chief revenue officer. “We work to build relationships and lean into what our customers value—time, choice, and control—because every minute matters.”

Since becoming a flyExclusive client in 2020, a Delray Beach, Florida-based CEO of a software company who declined to be identified, has attended a number of private member events, from fishing trips and the 2024 U.S. Open at Pinehurst—where flyExclusive hosted around 100 guests in a luxury suite—to the Firestone Grand Prix of St. Petersburg, Fla..

“In terms of the additional stuff, it’s icing on the cake. We’ve had amazing experiences,” he says. “It’s more than just a jet card. It’s like joining a real club with events you can look forward to. The perks definitely enhance customer loyalty.”

Another provider famous for its events is Wheels Up, whose members receive an invitation to join the brand every year for the Masters. During the golf tournament, the “Wheels Up Clubhouse” offers an array of luxury hospitality, including food, beverages, and entertainment.

Sentient Jet, which is celebrating its 25th anniversary, has added 12 partners—ranging from high-end hotels to luxury leather goods brands—to its latest “Exclusive Benefits Guide,” an annual premium perk available exclusively to its jet card owners.

Now in its 11th edition, the guide includes benefits across the worlds of travel, food and beverage, wellness, sporting events, and beyond. The estimated total value exceeds US$225,000, including exclusive discounts and partnerships with brands such as Auberge Resorts, Human Longevity Wellness & Medical Testing, and the Little Nell in Aspen.

“Sentient’s Exclusive Benefits Guide is like the Neiman Marcus holiday catalog, except everything is free or discounted. It’s impressive,” says Gollan of Private Jet Card Comparisons.

The provider’s best-known perk can be enjoyed every May through its partnership with the Kentucky Derby. (Sentient was the first private aviation partner of Churchill Downs beginning in 2016.) Card owners enjoy a “behind the gates” experience including access to Sentient’s private suite, where they can mingle with celebrity guests. A highlight is the annual Derby Day breakfast, a French-inspired bash in the Hotel Distil hosted by celebrity chef and Sentient Jet brand ambassador Bobby Flay. (As an extra perk for new card owners, Sentient offers a complimentary hour of flight time and a US$2,500 betting voucher.)

“Our longstanding partnership with the Kentucky Derby and Bobby Flay goes beyond a hosted breakfast—it’s a reflection of how we like to curate experiences for our card owners,” says Kirsten LaMotte, senior vice president, business development, partnerships and events at Sentient Jet. “We are proud to help our card owners focus less on the stress of getting to their events, and more on helping create unique travel memories.”

Card owners enjoy a “behind the gates” experience at the Kentucky Derby including access to Sentient’s private suite, where they can mingle with celebrity guests.
Meagan Jordan

VistaJet offers its biggest perks through its “Private World” portfolio of bespoke adventures crafted by the provider and its network of hundreds of trusted partners. In 2023, member requests more than doubled from the previous year, and 2024 is on track to surpass this, according to the company.

“We view Private World as a valuable enhancement to our members’ lives that extends beyond their time spent in the air,” says Matteo Atti, VistaJet’s chief marketing officer. “Private World is more than hedonistic; it’s a testament to our dedication to our members’ lives, in the air and on the ground.”

Notable examples include personalised wine tours, rejuvenating wellness retreats, and ultimate Formula 1 packages—a benefit of VistaJet’s partnership with Ferrari—featuring private dinners with drivers Charles Leclerc and Carlos Sainz.

The newest curated experiences and events for VistaJet members include a luxury cacao travel experience in Ecuador, and a humpback whale helicopter safari in Mozambique.

Like most providers, VistaJet refrains from commenting on specific customers.

Nearing 25 years in business, Flexjet has introduced its “Red Label” program. Offered to super-midsize aircraft fractional owners and above, key features include flight crews assigned to a single, specific aircraft, custom cabin interiors, and exclusive experiences such as the inaugural “Chairman’s Club” event. Clients have jetted to the likes of Anguilla and Lake Como, where they’ve been hosted by Flexjet’s chairman Kenn Ricci and CEO Mike Silvestro. (The only caveat was that the owners were required to use their fractional share to travel to the destination—the rest of the trip was complimentary.)

At the Anguilla event, 12 couples enjoyed accommodations at Cap Juluca, a Belmond Hotel, along with golfing and spa experiences, an exclusive luncheon on a private island, and a fireworks display that concluded the extended weekend. Earlier this year, 15 couples were hosted at Lake Como’s Villa d’Este while enjoying one-of-a-kind experiences including shopping with a Vogue fashion editor and a helicopter excursion to Lake Iseo where they enjoyed a private tour of Ferretti Group’s Riva shipyard (a tour not available to the public).

Next year, Ricci and Silvestro will be hosting the next Chairman’s Club event in San Miguel, Mexico.

According to David Gitman, CEO of Monarch Air Group, a Fort Lauderdale-based private jet charter provider, the private aviation industry has been experiencing a correction following a surge of interest during the pandemic.

“As the market cools off, the consumer has many more choices now as there are more available aircraft, compared to the shortage we experienced a few years earlier. This causes charter companies to provide more perks to the consumer,” he says. “In my opinion, the main perk that is happening right now is the competition between the various private jet providers. Clients that are not locked in to an agreement are benefiting from this market correction.”

A wave of corporate warnings and technical disclosures has flooded the media, with headlines worrying over “swarms” of rogue artificial-intelligence agents launching “unprecedented” cyberattacks, outsmarting their makers, and inching toward a terrifying autonomy. The most revealing part of this narrative isn’t what the software did. It’s who is telling the story—and why. When corporate leaders publicly insist that the systems they financed, engineered and deployed are suddenly beyond their power to contain, skepticism isn’t only healthy; it is essential.

For years, Silicon Valley has drawn scrutiny from civil society and global regulators over tangible harms such as youth mental health deterioration and systematic privacy violations. Today, industry figures seem to be trying to change that public image. Loudly blowing the whistle on their own systems—just as two of the leading companies were preparing for massive initial public offerings—lets AI executives position themselves as a new generation of leaders who have come to terms with their societal responsibilities. They seem to want us to believe that they no longer want to “move fast and break things” but will instead stand as vigilant guardians between humanity and a technological apocalypse.

There is one glaring problem: Software doesn’t rebel. A mathematical model possesses neither intent, malice nor the will to defy its creators, let alone extinguish our species. AI is a human artifact, engineered for profit.

When an agentic model in an evaluation sandbox connects to an unauthorized server or executes an exploit, it hasn’t staged a coup. It has tried to meet the human-defined objectives set out before it through a path its designers failed to constrain. It’s the digital equivalent of the King Midas myth, in which the king’s ill-defined wish turns even his food and drink into gold.

That powerful experimental models were able to discover novel vulnerabilities and breach external systems isn’t a sign of a dangerous superintelligence but of human error or negligence. There is no sentient actor lurking in the weights to be reasoned with, feared or pacified. There are only human software engineers, product managers and corporate boards deciding which guardrails are worth the latency cost and which permissions can be skipped in the race to market.

Policymakers and voters need to resist AI exceptionalism. In any other discipline—from civil engineering to pharmaceuticals—courts and regulators treat a system failure as evidence of bad product design and inadequate safety testing. If an aircraft crashes, we focus on finding the engineering defect, correcting it, and enforcing established liability standards for the damage created.

By leaning on an anthropomorphic narrative, Silicon Valley attempts to repackage its specific human choices that led to experimental, powerful models behaving unexpectedly during tests as an existential peril. Elevating the issue to a cosmic scale leaves the public paralyzed and takes ordinary product accountability off the table.

In the cutthroat race for venture capital and market dominance, building guardrails slows down deployment. Grandstanding about uncontrollable power costs nothing and generates billions of dollars in free publicity, justifying stock prices, all while cultivating an aura of technological capability not only to build the frontier but also ultimately to rein it in.

Governments need to recognize regulatory capture when it stares them in the face. Tech leaders’ strategy looks transparent: Alarm Washington and Brussels into creating a regime in which only trillion-dollar incumbents with fully staffed compliance and safety departments can legally operate. By sitting at the policymakers’ tables before anyone else, these companies can help draft rules digging an impassable moat protecting them from open-source developers and upstart competitors, domestic or international. The real danger is in further concentrating the tech industry into the hands of only a few companies with deep pockets.

Beijing and Washington have brushed off those tech leaders’ calls, albeit for very different reasons. Chinese state media dismissed them as part of the “Cold War playbook” and intended to preserve U.S. dominance. Xi Jinping argued for exactly the opposite at the Brics Summit on Sept. 12, calling on Brics countries to “strengthen cooperation in the field of AI, encourage open source, openness, collaboration and sharing, and break new grounds and scale new heights.” President Trump, steeped in a doctrine of unfettered capitalism and technological supremacy, called fears that AI could destroy humanity a “hoax.” Vice President JD Vance warned that AI companies “begging the government to regulate them” looked like a “Trojan Horse.”

Striving to pursue its “European way” on AI and assert regulatory leadership, Europe, by contrast, welcomed the call. European Union President Ursula von der Leyen made this clear at the State of the EU speech last Wednesday and announced that the EU will invite “the main frontier labs for a discussion on how we can support ongoing industry efforts to pace the frontier.”

Europe has been here before. In an effort to lead global regulation and react to fears borne from ChatGPT, Europe rushed its landmark AI Act into law in 2024. Already the world’s most restrictive rulebook, the framework quickly proved too broad and complex to enforce. Stalled by implementation delays and concerns about European competitiveness, the EU postponed the law’s full rollout, leaving regulations uncertain.

AI should be regulated—risks exist and should be taken seriously. But governments need to act based on available evidence and verified facts, not corporate PR panic, the views of industry insiders, or the desire for quick political wins. The greatest danger facing society isn’t that software will awaken and overthrow its human masters. It is that we will allow the creators of the software to abdicate human responsibility for the systems they choose to build and help them pull up the ladder to market access behind them.

When It Comes to Private Jet Perks, the Sky’s the Limit

AI doesn’t rebel—people design, deploy and profit from it. The real danger lies in allowing tech companies to escape accountability while shaping regulations that protect their dominance.